View Topic

Sexual Privacy Act
Category: Human Rights  |  Strength: Mild  |  Proposed by: Abazhaka

ACKNOWLEDGING the need for sexual privacy;

RECOGNIZING the need for some regulation of sexual behavior;

MANDATES a ban on incest, however the state chooses to define it;

REQUIRES the setting of an age of consent, as well as defining 'consent';

MANDATES a ban on public sex acts;

MANDATES neither private nor government prosecution, surveillance of, and interference in a consensual private sex act between two or more consenting individuals.

TASKS member nations with implementing and abiding by these policies, as well as prosecuting offenders of these policies

Oh my god.  This is terrible.  None of this fits in the "human rights" category.  Also, how can the state mandate statutory rape laws, a ban on incest, and a ban on public sex acts, but then prohibit government or private enforcement of these laws? I just...

Official debate thread:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=340245

Man, just no good sex-related proposals these days, are there?
Oof, I can't really say anything that PB didn't say but this is horrid, really...

Makes for entertaining reading, in any event. Just point and laugh.

lolno.

If I was going to convince my friends that quality work comes out of the GA occasionally, this would not be one of the things I would show them.

"Now see kids?  This is why we can't have nice things, because of proposals like these."